🚨🚨🚨 CAVS CHAMP FIRES BACK: A 2016 Cavaliers champion reacts to Draymond Green’s shot at Matthew Dellavedova, sparking heated debates among fans, reigniting old Finals memories, and fueling speculation about whether lingering rivalries between Golden State and Cleveland stars are truly buried—or ready to explode again.

Draymond Green

Golden State Warriors defensive star Draymond Green recently made some disrespectful comments regarding former Cleveland Cavaliers guard Matthew Dellavedova that caused a stir. Green said that he has plenty of respect for the Australian, but also claimed that he “stinks” as a basketball player.

Former NBA forward Richard Jefferson, who was a member of the 2016 Cavaliers title team with Dellavedova, has since responded to what Green had to say and came to his former teammate’s defense.

“Why is Delly catching strays?” Jefferson asked. “First of all, if people knew how good at basketball you had to be to suck in the NBA. If you knew how good you had to be, right? Delly could go.”

Fellow 2016 Cavs champion Channing Frye mentioned that Dellavedova started in the 2015 NBA Finals, and Jefferson responded.

“Yes, and win a game,” he said. “Are we being real right now? Come on. Come on, people. Hey, look, was Delly the ultimate underdog? Yes. Delly battled his way. … Delly would literally die for you. Give me that man in battle any single day — in a game, not practice, in a game. Delly had — let’s put it this way: Delly had some dog in him where he was D’ing up Kyrie [Irving] so hard it didn’t go well.”

Dellavedova is far from the most athletic or talented player ever to suit up in the NBA, but he should have earned Green’s respect with how hard he played for the Cavs against his Warriors in the 2015 NBA Finals. With Irving down for the count for a majority of that year’s championship series, Dellavedova was called on to start five out of the six games in the series.

Defensively, he was tasked with slowing down superstar Stephen Curry and guarded him about as well as one possibly can. Curry was still the Warriors’ leading scorer in the series, but he turned the ball over a bit and was held to a very poor shooting performance in Game 2.

It was on the less glamorous end of the floor where Dellavedova made his biggest impact in the 2015 NBA Finals, but he sprinkled in one big scoring performance during that best-of-seven series as well. In a Game 3 that the Cavaliers won to take a 2-1 series lead against Golden State, Dellavedova scored 20 points (the second-most on the team) while shooting 7-of-17 from the floor.

Although Cleveland came up short in 2015, Dellavedova ended up getting a ring with the team the following year.

Hopefully, Green will eventually change his mind about Dellavedova, but it’s possible he said what he said because he’s still got sour grapes about how the 35-year-old locked up Curry at points in the NBA Finals 10 years ago. At the very least, it’s evident that those who played with Dellavedova at the highest level have a lot of respect for what he brought to the table.

Related Posts

SF Gіantѕ Eye Dіvіѕіon Rіval Fіrѕt Baѕeman Deѕріte Deрth at the Poѕіtіon

Why Luis ArrĂĄez Could Be a Smart Free-Agent Target for the Giants This Offseason The San Francisco Giants may feel like they’re set at first base heading into 2025. With Rafael…

Winners aren’t built by throwing money at stars — they’re forged in chemistry, culture, and the kind of ruthless patience the Dodgers and Blue Jays mastered while the Mets kept chasing shortcuts. LA and Toronto built cores, trusted development, and played the long game, while New York kept spinning the roster wheel and expecting instant glory. If the Mets don’t adjust their blueprint, they won’t just fall short — they’ll keep watching real contenders lap them from every corner of baseball’s new era..ll

The secret to constructing a true contender may actually lie more in run creation* than prevention…

“If Pete Alonso leaves, I will never trust Steven Cohen again,” Francisco Lindor said through tears, sending a warning that pierced the walls of the Mets’ front office and reverberated through the locker room. This wasn’t just emotion — it was a challenge, a statement that loyalty, culture, and legacy carry weight beyond dollars and contracts. Every whisper, glance, and decision now carries tension, as players and management feel the pressure of promises unkept and futures uncertain. In the Bronx, one superstar’s potential departure can fracture trust and rewrite the story of an entire era..ll

In the high-stakes world of professional baseball, emotions often run as high as the stakes themselves. One such moment unfolded recently when Francisco Lindor, the star shortstop for the New York Mets, made a heartfelt declaration that has sent shockwaves through the Major League Baseball community. “If Pete Alonso leaves, I will never trust Steven Cohen again,” Lindor said through tears, delivering what many interpret as a veiled warning to the Mets owner. This statement not only highlights the deep bonds within the Mets clubhouse but also underscores the growing concerns about team stability under Cohen‘s leadership. As trade rumors swirl around Alonso, the first baseman who has become a cornerstone of the franchise, Lindor‘s words serve as a poignant reminder of the human element in sports management. In this article, we delve into the context, implications, and broader ramifications of this emotional outburst, exploring how it reflects on the New York Mets‘ future.

$158 million wasn’t enough — Steve Cohen admits the grind of negotiating with Pete Alonso, nicknamed the “Polar Bear,” left even the Mets’ owner exhausted and exposed the full weight of player power in modern baseball. This isn’t just a contract; it’s a clash of ambition, legacy, and authority, where one superstar can bend the game and test the patience of the richest executives. Every figure, every clause, every decision ripples through the clubhouse, the media, and the league, signaling that the balance of control has shifted. In the Bronx, even the boldest offers can’t tame a force like Alonso..ll

In the world of professional baseball, contract negotiations can be as intense as the games themselves. Recently, a shocking revelation has rocked the New York Mets fanbase and the broader Major League Baseball (MLB) community. Steve Cohen, the billionaire owner of the Mets, publicly admitted that he was utterly exhausted after trying to retain star first baseman Pete Alonso. Despite offering a staggering $158 million deal, it wasn’t sufficient to keep the player known as the “Polar Bear” in Queens. This development highlights the complexities of baseball contracts, player value, and the high-stakes drama behind the scenes in professional sports. Let’s dive deep into this story, exploring the details, implications, and what it means for the future of Pete Alonso and the New York Mets.

“If Alonso leaves, the Mets will lose more than one player” isn’t just a warning anymore — it’s a looming reality as Scott Boras maneuvers behind the scenes, setting the stage for a winter transfer that could shake the clubhouse, scramble rotations, and rewrite the balance of power in New York. This isn’t simple roster management; it’s a chess match where loyalty, ego, and legacy collide, and every move echoes far beyond the diamond. As whispers turn into strategy and potential dominoes line up, the Mets brace for a winter that could redefine not just a team, but an era..ll

The New York Mets have long been a cornerstone of Major League Baseball, captivating fans with their storied history and passionate fanbase. However, recent developments surrounding star first baseman Pete Alonso have sparked intense speculation about the team’s future. The phrase “If Alonso leaves, the Mets will lose more than one player” is echoing through the baseball community, and as Scott Boras gears up for maneuvers in the winter transfer window, it seems this scenario is inching closer to reality. This article delves deep into the implications of Alonso‘s possible exit, exploring how it could reshape the Mets’ roster, morale, and competitive edge in the coming seasons.

Bronx dropped a nuclear checkbook flex, firing a staggering $500 million at Pete Alonso and daring the league to survive in a world where the Yankees redefine power and rewrite the market in real time. This isn’t spending — it’s empire engineering, a legacy gamble walking the razor edge between fearless ambition and financial insanity as New York shoves every chip into the center before October even breathes. The question isn’t if the Pinstripes can dominate — it’s whether baseball is prepared for a dynasty that refuses to blink, no matter the price tag..ll

INSANE DEAL: Yankees SHOCK MLB with UNBELIEVABLE $500 Million Contract for Pete Alonso—The New York Powerhouse Continues to Dominate, but What’s the Price of