Ruud van Nistelrooy has launched a scathing attack on the match officials after Leicester City’s controversial 2-1 defeat to Manchester United at Old Trafford last night. The Foxes boss was left furious after Erik ten Hag’s side grabbed a late winner in a match marred by two highly questionable decisions, which Van Nistelrooy insists played a direct role in the outcome.

The Dutch manager, visibly frustrated, refused to shake hands with United boss Ruben Amorim at full-time, sparking speculation that his anger was directed not just at the officials but also at his opposite number.

Van Nistelrooy: “They won because of the referee!”

Speaking in his post-match press conference, Van Nistelrooy did not hold back:

“It’s such a shameful thing that a team like Manchester United cannot beat Leicester at Old Trafford without help. If not for the referee, we would have easily won. But of course, it’s United at home, so they get the decisions. It’s disgusting.”

The former United striker went on to reveal that he had reported the officiating to the appropriate authorities, highlighting two specific incidents that he claims were suspicious:

“I have already reported them for two things I saw yesterday. They won’t escape this, I promise. We all saw it. The first goal was offside. Clear as day. But they don’t check it properly. And then in the second half, we should have had a penalty—no doubt about it. But again, nothing. It’s a joke.”

What were the two controversial moments?

Van Nistelrooy was particularly outraged by Manchester United’s second goal, which replays suggested had a hint of offside in the buildup. Despite protests from the Leicester players, VAR allowed the goal to stand, leaving the visitors furious.

The second incident involved Leicester being denied a penalty after what appeared to be a clear foul inside the box. Van Nistelrooy and his staff erupted in anger on the touchline when the referee waved away their appeals, and VAR did not intervene.

Did Van Nistelrooy’s anger lead to a snub at full-time?

After the final whistle, Van Nistelrooy was seen storming off the pitch without acknowledging Ruben Amorim, further fueling speculation that his frustration extended beyond the referees.

Some believe the Dutchman was disgusted by the way United handled the situation, possibly accusing Amorim of being complicit in the questionable officiating. Others suggest he was simply too angry to engage in any post-match pleasantries.

What happens next?

Leicester are expected to formally request a review of the officiating, but history suggests that little will come of it. Meanwhile, Van Nistelrooy’s explosive comments could land him in trouble with the FA, who do not take kindly to managers publicly questioning referees’ integrity.

This controversy will no doubt add more fuel to the ongoing debates about officiating standards in the Premier League. As for Manchester United, they take the three points—but their victory will forever be tainted by controversy.