Manchester United’s dramatic 4–4 draw against Bournemouth has taken a shocking new twist, as the Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) have reportedly admitted to major officiating errors following a post-match VAR review. According to sources close to the review process, United were wrongly denied three clear penalties, all involving controversial decisions linked to Bournemouth winger Antoine Semenyo.

The revelation has reignited widespread anger among Manchester United fans, pundits, and former referees, with many now labeling the incident as one of the worst VAR controversies of the Premier League season.

What initially looked like another frustrating night for Rúben Amorim’s side may now be remembered as a moment where officiating failures directly altered the league table.

⸻

THE INCIDENTS THAT SPARKED OUTRAGE

During the chaotic encounter at Old Trafford, Manchester United were denied three separate penalty appeals, each dismissed after VAR intervention. The most controversial involved Semenyo, whose actions were later deemed to have met the criteria for penalty decisions under Premier League regulations.

Incident One: Clear Handball in the Box

Early in the second half, Semenyo appeared to block a goal-bound effort with his arm inside the penalty area. Despite replays showing the arm in an unnatural position, VAR advised the on-field referee to play on.

Incident Two: Shirt Pull During a Goal Attempt

Later in the match, United striker Rasmus Højlund was pulled back inside the area while attempting to meet a cross. Again, VAR declined to intervene.

Incident Three: Late Challenge Denying a Scoring Opportunity

In stoppage time, a clumsy challenge on Alejandro Garnacho prevented a clear chance on goal. VAR review was brief and resulted in no further action.

According to insiders, all three incidents were later acknowledged internally by PGMOL as incorrect decisions.

⸻

PGMOL ADMISSION AND INTERNAL REVIEW

Sources indicate that PGMOL have privately conceded that VAR failed to apply the Laws of the Game correctly in all three moments. The review reportedly highlighted:

•Inconsistent application of handball rules

•Failure to intervene on clear and obvious errors

•Poor communication between VAR officials and the referee

While no official public apology has yet been issued, disciplinary action is expected against the match officials involved. Referees and VAR assistants from the game are reportedly set to be stood down from upcoming Premier League fixtures.

⸻

IMPACT ON THE LEAGUE TABLE

The consequences of the errors go far beyond one match. Had Manchester United been awarded even two of the three penalties, they would almost certainly have secured all three points.

Instead of one point, United could have taken maximum points — a swing that now places them ahead of Chelsea in the Premier League standings following the review conclusions.

This development has intensified calls for greater accountability and transparency in VAR decision-making.

⸻

RUBEN AMORIM’S POSITION

Manchester United manager Rúben Amorim refrained from making inflammatory comments immediately after the match, but sources close to the club confirm that United formally submitted a complaint to the Premier League and PGMOL within hours of the final whistle.

Club officials are said to be furious, believing that repeated VAR failures are undermining their progress during a crucial rebuilding phase.

Internally, the club believes the errors “crossed the threshold of acceptable human mistake.”

⸻

REACTION FROM FANS AND PUNDITS

Manchester United supporters erupted across social media, organizing online protests and calling for drastic reforms to VAR usage. Some fans even demanded a replay of the fixture, though such outcomes remain extremely unlikely under current regulations.

Former referees and pundits also weighed in, with several agreeing that at least two of the three decisions should have resulted in penalties.

One former Premier League official stated:

“These are not subjective calls. These are textbook penalties. VAR exists precisely to correct this type of error.”

Roy Keane, already critical of United’s performance, shifted focus briefly to the officiating, describing it as “incompetent at best.”

⸻

THE SEMENYO CONTROVERSY

Semenyo found himself at the center of the storm despite an otherwise solid performance. While Bournemouth officials defended the player, analysts pointed out that the issue was not intent but application of the rules.

Under current handball guidelines, the position of Semenyo’s arm alone would have warranted a penalty regardless of intent.

⸻

BROADER QUESTIONS ABOUT VAR

This incident adds to growing concerns about VAR consistency across the Premier League. Clubs have increasingly voiced frustration over:

•Lack of accountability

•Absence of public explanations

•Different interpretations week after week

There are now renewed calls for post-match VAR audio releases and independent oversight.

⸻

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT

While Manchester United are unlikely to be officially awarded three points retroactively, the disciplinary action against officials could lead to changes in VAR appointments and protocol enforcement.

The Premier League is expected to issue a statement within days addressing the controversy.

For United, the focus now shifts back to football — but the anger remains.

⸻

CONCLUSION

What should have been remembered as a thrilling 4–4 encounter has instead become a case study in VAR failure. With PGMOL reportedly admitting serious mistakes, Manchester United fans feel vindicated — but also robbed.

The question now is not whether VAR got it wrong, but how many more times clubs must pay the price before real reform arrives.